Answers in Genesis, in their review on the book Seven Days That Divide the World, wrote the following:
In his book Seven Days That Divide the World, Lennox explores the “potential minefield” of the controversy of Genesis and science. He wrote the book for people who have been put off considering the Christian faith because of the “. . . very silly, unscientific story that the world was made in seven days,” (Lennox 2011, p. 12) for convinced Christians who are disturbed by the controversy, as well as for those who take the Bible seriously but do not agree on the interpretation of the creation account (Lennox 2011, p. 12).
–from Answers Research Journal
Answers in Genesis is what could be termed a “young earth” or “back to the Bible” movement, depending on how you look at it, but in truth the six-day creation ‘issue’ is not only about the earth’s creation in six days, or even about simply ‘returning’ to the Bible, but instead about the authority of the Bible: that is, looking at the world through the scope of God’s Word.
Something disturbing began sinking in for me when I read the reason Lennox wrote his book. Look with me again at this statement if you will:
He wrote the book for people who have been put off considering the Christian faith because of the “. . . very silly, unscientific story that the world was made in seven days,” (Lennox 2011, p. 12)
Here is what disturbs: the idea that we must conform to the evolutionary hypothesis (and this is an oversimplification, as there is not one singular evolutionary hypothesis) in order to make the Gospel ‘appealing’ or ‘acceptable’ to people.
This idea should send shock waves through the Christian’s soul. And here’s why:
My goodness, but I can alter the Gospel message in better ways than that to make it appealing and acceptable!!
Is that what we’re aiming for? Certainly I can do that!
No worldwide flood–it upsets evolutionists. No flood at all–the theme of God’s judgment is always unattractive.
Now get rid of God’s judgment on Sodom & Gomorrah–how many people could we pull in if we got rid of the burning sulfur and fire?
Don’t talk about Abraham almost sacrificing his son–atheists get really offended by that event.
And cut out the Ten Commandments–they offend every sinner who is not convicted.
And the holy battles of judgment where God wiped out wicked people–we need to scratch them from the record. For that matter, get rid of all the acts of judgment against immorality during the time of Moses.
But why stop there? We can attract even more people if we get rid of the judges, since they were sent to be intolerant of sin and bring the people to repentance and obedience before God–and we know how offensive that message is!
What’s left of the Old Testament? Nothing about animal sacrifices–that would offend PETA. Nothing about the surety of God–that would make the Gospel less acceptable to agnostics.
You could leave in Ruth, I suppose–that’s not too offensive . . but you’d have to take out her devotion to one God (that would offend Hindus and Confucians, for example), and her submission to her mother-in-law, since the very concept of submission offends nowadays.
And for that reason, you’d have to leave out the book of Esther–Esther is submissive to the king, her husband, and that’s way unacceptable in our culture.
Now that there’s no Old Testament, let’s take a look at the new.
Jesus’ virgin birth creates a lot of controversy and drives naturalists away. John the Baptist jumping for joy in his mother’s womb is highly offensive to the abortion movement. Speaking of John, his message of sin, repentance, and change is a huge deterrent to keep people from accepting the Gospel message.
Let’s not even think of telling people Jesus’ words about selfishness, lust, and greed! And none of His healings or miracles can be permitted–those make the Gospel seem silly to naturalists.
No parables–they invoke life change, and we all know life change is uncomfortable to people.
What about Jesus revealing Himself as the only atonement for sin? Well, there’s no count of how many groups that offends, so that must go, too.
Since the plot against Jesus by many Jewish leaders is seen as anti-Semitic, we must cut it from the Bible as well.
And take out the cross–it offends Muslims. Take out the resurrection–it offends atheists.
There can’t be any of James’ writing on faith in action. Why, it’s so radical it would unsettle millions of complacent people!
Time to take out Paul–he offends basically all unbelievers somewhere or other in the revelations he shares from God.
That leaves Revelation, which too must go. We can’t have God destroying sin, because that’s infuriating to everybody who loves sin.
The theme of Jesus as King–those who want to be their own god will never accept it.
Now make no mention of angels or demons–naturalists can’t accept them. The Bible’s concept of Heaven with individuals rejoicing there–Buddists and Hindus can’t go for it, so remove it. And the Bible’s concept of Heaven as being only by the merit of Jesus Christ–can any other religion accept it?
Fortunately, this is the last book that talks about sexual sin–let’s be sure to clip that out, especially sex before marriage, adultery, and homosexuality.
And can we dare to say that all people who do not believe in Christ go to Hell? Remove Hell, too, and at we are at last almost done.
Is anything left? It must go. All of Scripture must go. Everything. Wiped away, empty, so that the Gospel can at last be appealing to all.
The Gospel of no gospel.
The no gospel is now acceptable to everyone! No offense–no good news. No God, no Law, no Redeemer, no forgiveness, no salvation, no redemption, no purification, and no eternal Life.
No longer must we fear appearing silly or unscientific or intolerant or anything whatsoever objectionable.
There’s nothing left, and at last we have pleased even the most difficult group to please: the Satanists. There is plenty of room now for them, and everyone else, to write their own book to live their life by.
And no longer do we have Christ.
If you find this bearable, then you do not know the God who died for you.
But if you find this unbearable, then you must commit with me to stop trying to manipulate and alter Scripture for the sake of appealing to the unbeliever who must come to the Word, Christ Jesus, to be saved from everlasting Hell, just as every believer has already done.
An unoffensive and popular Jesus does not choose to lay His hands out on a crossbeam to have them nailed there by a wicked legion of soldiers and a mocking crowd.
An unoffensive and popular Jesus does not choose to be stripped of even the dignity of humanity for us. The Bible says Jesus chose to be so tortured by our sin that He no longer even looked human (see Isaiah 52:14).
What about that was easy? What about that was appealing?
We need to draw back our hands from trying to revise our God to try to ‘make’ Him be more acceptable to the world that crucified Him . . and we need to hold our hands in awed worship that He has saved us, the crucifiers, His way, from the powers and hold of Hell.
We need to stop treating God’s Word like some paperback we picked up at the bookstore and halfway like, and start treating it as the holy Message of Salvation for every sinner on earth.
The Good News isn’t good news when we try to distort its righteousness to conform it to the wickedness of the world. God’s Word will not conform, and that leaves you and I with a question that will matter for our eternity:
Do we stand on God’s side, or do we not?
If we do, we need to start obeying Him in full of every letter of what He says, with the blood of Jesus to cover us every time we fail.
And if we don’t, we need to throw off any guise of following Him and make it clear that we abandon His Word altogether.
See to it that no one takes you captive through hollow and deceptive philosophy, which depends on human tradition and the basic principles of this world rather than on Christ. (Colossians 2:8, NIV)